st.christopher

The New Unification Church: Restoring the Unification Terminolgy with New Theology



Posted: Sunday, March 27, 2011

by st.christopher
unicorn144

The Soul and the Spirit are the Two Hands of God Victory; Joy and Hope Called Chosen and Faithful: the Virgins of the Throne of God and the Lamb The Altar of Abraham Restoring the Sacrifice: the 10 pieces of theProvidence of Salvation.

The 7 Horns of the 4 horns of the Altar in the Baptism of Fire To further uncover the significance of the Holy Spirit of the Lord Jehovah in the form of a Dove that came down on Lord Jesus and abode upon him at the Jordan is to reveal that the Nation of Israel entering Cannan was as Adam "symbolically" re-entering Paradise; going over the Jordan dryshod the Nation of Israel was as Adam going over through the "symbolic" Gate through the "barrier" that is the "great river Euphrates"

It is for this reason that he was given the 10 commandments as Adam had only one; for "10 times the Original Indemnity"; but since Israel also received the 3 fold Blessing of God from Balaam we can see at the first 7 altars of Balaam the formation stage "to be fruitful"; as for Eve's first 7 years in Paradise with Adam; the second 7 altars of Balaam at the growth stage "and multiply" for Eve's second 7 years in Paradise; and "subdue the earth and have dominion" as the perfection stage of Eve's final 21 years in Paradise with Adam seen in the last 7 altars of Balaam; which meant that the Blessing was multiplied if Israel kept the Law at "7 times the Original 3 fold Blessing".

That the 12 later Apostles of the Lamb were also baptized in this same Jordan also had tremendous meaning,as each of the 12 therefore stood as a "prince" of Israel as having one of the 12 tribes as his work; to thus bring forth the fruit of each trribe as his own "fruit" or "work" had to do with the fact that Lord Jesus was God's "Fruit"; and the 12 represented "Christ's fruit". But it was the Child he put in their midst at the Last Judgement that they discovered he would be the one whose throne would manifest the 12 thrones they would sit on at the End; but here we see Arthur as the Son of Man in his Day; and 12 Apostles of the Lamb as 12 good and brave knights on the 12 thrones that represent the 12 hours of the New Day: an Eternal Day, if you will.

The Judge: and the 12 Apostles of the Lamb as the Jury.



But let us attend to the main body of this piece; for here begins the laborious process which comes at even greater length in my book; so here I stick to a bare "skeleton" of what the real issues of Issac and Ishmael and the conception of Rev. Moon in relation to those beliefs held by John the Baptist himself which my Brother John made me aware of in restoring the errors in the Providence that appear in his book "Divine Principle". ((All the subsequent quotes from Rev. Moon's book are from the Black Book; 1973 Edition; which came to me from the hand of Bradford Kent Bufkin: from the hand of Rev. Moon himself.)) Gabriel and Mary; after Zacharias; but before his death When Gabriel came to Zacharias and then Mary it was to confirm one miracle to Mary that caused the second miracle to take place; for it is said: "And Mary believed". As awesome as the two miracles which attended the conceptions of John and then Jesus were in scope these two miracles were like the creation of an earthly pigeon in comparison to a heavenly dove. John even said that he was earthly and "spoke of the earth" to show that the conception of Jesus was far above his. Thus John stood for the Law itself as in the position of the Pillar of Fire or Covenant of Night as the "Priest"; even as Jesus stood for the Word itself as in the position of the Pillar of Cloud or Covenant of Day as the "Prince".

This is because the conception of John by Zacharias with Elisabeth in comparison to that of Jesus by Jehovah with Mary was like that of a pigeon relation in it's species to that of the more refined appearing dove; and John and Jesus were cousins by blood; although brothers in Spirit. Yet John's family was rich; and of the upper class; while Jesus's family was humble; and of a more menial labor as lower class. This is why the Word came from Jerusalem; and the Law from Zion; as Isaiah had written; for Mary was the "poor" virgin daughter of Jerusalem; and Elisabeth represented the "rich" House of Zion that Gabriel had Mary go to until John was born.

As Lord Jesus said of John the Baptist :

"But they who wear soft clothes are from king's houses"

to show John's real status in relation to those he baptized.

The following statement is from a conversation at the Table of the 12 Apostles of the Lamb when they corrected the errors Rev. Moon made in his book "Divine Principle" when John spoke of to me and the oothers at the Supper of the Great God about the 5 creatures Abraham placed on his Altar to be seperated; which is written of in the third section of the Gospel of Peace called "The Feast of the 12 Fruits from the Tree of Life".

Said John; "As you may recall it was not one dove that was placed on the Altar of Abraham as Mr. Moon has written in his book "Divine Principle": it was a Pigeon for Ishmael and a Dove for Issac. Furthermore it was the she-goat that represented Hagar as Egypt and the heifer which represented Sarah as the Promised Land. The ram represented Abraham himself."

The further explanation I was given is here therefore compared to what Rev. Moon himself wrote; so that the reader might be able to clearly see the correct version as distinct to the convoluted and precarious explanation offered by Rev. Moon.

Reverend's Moon's own explanation of the 10 pieces of the Altar of Abrahamand what they symbolized is quite different in his ownbook's section called "The Symbolic Offering of Abraham" that begins on page 264. Lest people think I am being unfair in using this 1973 edition's version rather than the one's in later print I can only say that the later editions have only amplified all the errors present here. And in restoring things it is best to start where the error begins; scientifically; one might say. Furthermore let me say that what the reader may glean of this "ilm" or "Science" is where the Design of Providence and the Pattern of Fate touch; yet the true facts must come out to show where and why Rev. Moon veered from thetruth;so one can understand the basis of later mistakes that were then made in the remaining pages of Rev. Moon's revolutionary and sublimely visionary work seen in his book "Divine Principle".

The Horn of Salvation: the Messenger of Christ His explanation begins in his book "Divine Principle" on page 265; line ten; to wit; " The archangel took Eve while Adam and Eve were still in the position of brother and sister in their immaturity, thus forcing all created things, as well as their own children, to be under his dominion. In order for Abraham to set up the condition to restore through indemnity the above mentioned situation, he was deprived by Pharaoh, who symbolized Satan, of his wife Sarah, who was in the position of Abraham's sister. Then he had to take back Sarah, in the position of his wife, together with Lot, symbolizing the whole of mankind, and his wealth, symbolizing the world of creation (Gen. 14:16). Abraham's course thus was the course for Jesus to walk in later days. It was only after Abraham had set up such a condition of indemnity that he could offer the symbolic sacrifice with the dove, the ram and heifer."

Said John ; "This is obviously true in itself rightup to the very last sentence: and this is exactly where the problem begins for Rev. Moonin attempting to "restore" the real meaning of what the Sacrifice of Abraham at the Altar representedin theDesign of Providence; because everything on that Altar represented the members of Abraham's own family. The "she-goat" represented Hagar as Egypt; the "heifer" represented Sarah as the Promised Land; and the "ram" represented Abraham himself. The "pigeon" which Rev. Moon omits symbolized Ishmael; and the "dove" represented Issac."

In cutting these 5 creatures in half Abraham was therefore to restore the Fall itself symbolically; and because Rev. Moon failed in what is written herein presenting the correct interpretation God was kind enough to have His servant John in the Holy Spirt of Truth to show me and perhaps others who might be interested the actual significance of the 10 pieces of the Altar in a more expanded version.

Originally the blood being drained from these 10 pieces the 5 were to be divided into meant dissolving the original sin present in all the blood relationships with the Angel of the Devil with Eve and then with Adam by Eve that weregiven totheir two children. This was to be done as the way to reverse the nature of the Fall; in which the Order of Creation was reversedby which God was to rule Adam; Adam to rule Eve; and Eve to rule the Serpent. Rev. Moon in his exposition of the Nature of the Fall in his book illustrates this quite clearly; and correctly as self-consistent with the Providence itself up to one point.

Judge not: lest ye be Judged!



This point is that the Fall included the position of the Archangel who God left in charge of the Creation while He rested on the 7th Day; which was unknown to Rev. Moon as he wrote that the Fall took place on the 6th day; which is wrong. That God left the Archangel in charge until He awoke should sound strangely familiar to Rev. Moon; since this is exactly the position the Angel of Christ put him in on earth before he left .

The Work of Abraham at the Altar was thus to reverse the line of the Fall when the Archangel took Adam's position, which was that of the Sun; the Serpent took the Archangel's position, which was that of the Day-Star; Eve took the Serpent's position which was the Evening Star and Adam was left in Eve's position; which was the Moon. Everyone ended up in the wrong position; but to see the true dimension of this problem is to uncover why Abraham "rescuing" Sarah from Pharaoh was so important to God.

To do this I have to reveal something which shows the actual dimension of why the Serpent was cursed even though it was his task and even his responsibility to be the Tempter of Adam and Eve. The Serpent was therefore the figure through whom Adam was to "subdue the earth": as one might break a proud horse that was then "tamed" but even quite useful. Yet there was more than this behind God placing the Serpent in the Garden as one of the original pieces on the chessboard of Providence.

The Commandment God gave Adam thus carried the instruction to divide himself from his shadow who appeared when Adam faced God: the Shadow of Night; the discarnate half of the Archangel himself. The Serpent as the "angel of the Devil" was then the Champion of "Eden" or "Nature"that accompanied the Commandment given to Adam as the resultant challenge and inherent trial that the Serpent was then the lawful advocate of to Man of the Commandment "not to eat" as it's attendent Temptation "to eat"; which Adam was to overcome and thus gain equality with the angels; which even God could not give to Man: it had to be earned in their own eyes so that men and angels could live as brothers; and serve each other as they were meant to.

How the children of God both fell is how Adam and Eve became the children of the Devil. Yet there is another dimension to this situation which has been unknown; as John revealed at the Emerald Table of Justice where he sits with the 11. John said ; "In Paradise it was part of God's Design that Eve fall for the serpent; and then Adam was to have "rescued" her from the serpent and become her personal "hero" or Saviour.

This was for the reason that Eve in being saved was therefore to have thenin her heart to love Adam all the more; and thus be the most receptive to him in saving her from her advesary who would have brought her to the brink of eternal damnation." For Eve to thus have adored Adamas her "Hero" and "Saviour" before they ate from the Fruit of the Tree of Life together would have been the giving of something in gratitude and awe that that would have brought about the most favorable conditions for creating their Child.

Thus after Adam had defeated the Serpent of Paradise and rescued his Bride he and Eve were Lawfully to be have been allowed to come together as one flesh at the Consummation. Eating together of the Fruit of the Tree of life they would have therefore both gained Immortality in Union within the Holy Spirit ofGod, as Adam initiated Eve into the Mystery of God; as He had Designed from the beginning.

This is why Lord Jesus said: to wi t; "...But they who are forgiven little; love little ..."

Eve was to then have fallen and been rescued; being repentant; and then restored; and thus redeemed as a Virgin once again by Adam. If this sounds like an old story well indeed so it is; what Robert Nye in his book "Merlin" calls "the one story; and the one story only." That it is the basis of all heroic literature and most of the plotlineswe see on TV is self-evident; the hero who suffers and gets the girl; and the Kiss at the end.

(( as an aside it is at the Summit of the 7th heaven of the 7 heavens that Adam was to have taken Eve through in the Act of Love the "Seal" that was to be placed when Adam created with Eve their "Child" was then to have been "impressed" onto their Child as well: the Star thus "set" at the 7th heaven; thus the ability for each to transmute matter by thought and other abilities seen with Lord Jesus and angels would have then be manifest in the Child from birth as born into the Kingdom itself; as the body of Eve would be have then been "the Earth" substantiallyand the soul of Eve as the firmament or"the heaven" consubstantially.Adam would stood as the "Body of God" Himself. )) This casts some light on what is written on this subject in the book of Mormon that the "Fall was predestined"." John said ; "Actually what was written in this "predestined fall" by Joseph Smith was "half-correct"; for Adam was obviously not to have fallen; less obviously the serpent was subtly made aware that he existed to have Adam finally triumph over him.

But here we have the real cause of the Fall; for some of the angels felt it was more fitting that mankind serve the angels; rather than the angels serving man; and especially woman who would also had dominion over the angels which some could not even countenance.
This Article has been viewed 390 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.